The Nevada Supreme Court held that NRCP 65(b)(2)’s 14-day limit applies to temporary restraining orders issued with notice as well as those issued without notice.
The Nevada Supreme Court held that citizen-review-board agendas must identify subject officers and that officers alleged no protectable privacy interest in public names and badge numbers.
The Nevada Supreme Court vacated and remanded with instructions to dismiss, holding en banc that while a party may challenge a district court’s jurisdiction over a first petition for judicial review in a subsequent NAPA petition, the subsequent petition must itself strictly comply with NRS 233B.130(2)(a) by naming all parties of record. Rocha’s second petition, which named DHHS but not the Personnel Commission, was jurisdictionally defective from the outset, and a belated amendment could not cure the defect.