Personal Injury & Tort Cases
Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided): –
Clear all
Coverage since October 2, 2025
✉️ New decisions, briefed in your inbox every morning — subscribe to Daily Case Law, free →

Personal Injury & Tort

Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Uncategorized

Rashada v. Ahmed — Radiologist Has No Duty to Recommend Biopsy After Identifying Mass, But Misinterpretation Claim Survives

The Fourth Department holds that a radiologist owes no duty to recommend a biopsy after identifying a hand mass on MRI — that obligation falls on the treating physician — while allowing the claim that the radiologist negligently misread the imaging to proceed to trial.

Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Uncategorized

Thurston v. Howard — Police U-Turn Negligence Upheld; VTL § 1104 Reckless Disregard Defense Lost to Discovery Sanction

The Fourth Department affirms a $908,000 verdict against Erie County after a deputy’s incomplete U-turn blocks a bus lane, holding that the VTL § 1104 reckless disregard defense was validly precluded as a discovery sanction and that the directed verdict on negligence was proper.

Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Uncategorized

Polisoto v. St. Gregory the Great R.C. Church — Snow Removal Contractor’s Actual Salting Practice Revives Duty-of-Care Question Under Espinal

The Fourth Department reinstates a slip-and-fall complaint against a snow removal contractor, finding that contractor’s actual salting practice on the day of the fall may have completely displaced the property owner’s duty to address ice, triggering an Espinal exception.

Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Uncategorized

Sarah R. v. Crouse Health Hospital — Hospital-Issued Scrubs and Emergency Circumstances Create Apparent Agency Issue for Jury

The Fourth Department reinstates a medical malpractice complaint against a hospital, finding hospital-issued scrubs, a Medical Staff badge, and emergency neonatal circumstances raise a triable question of apparent agency over independent-contractor neonatologists.

Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Uncategorized

Shattuck v. Dryden Mutual — Wrongful Disclaimer Is Anticipatory Repudiation, Bad Faith Claims Reinstated

The Fourth Department held that Dryden Mutual’s wrongful coverage disclaimer was an anticipatory repudiation excusing the insured from forwarding suit papers, barring the insurer from challenging the $2.8 million default judgment in a § 3420 direct action, and requiring reinstatement of bad faith claims under the Pavia “gross disregard” standard.

Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Uncategorized

Hurst v. State of New York — Snow Tubing Claim Dismissed Under Primary Assumption of Risk

The Fourth Department affirmed dismissal of a snow tubing personal injury claim against the State, holding that hitting a snow pile at the base of a hill was a foreseeable consequence of recreational sledding encompassed by the primary assumption of risk doctrine, and that the open and obvious snow piles did not unreasonably enhance that risk.

Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Uncategorized

Delisle v. FBBT/US Props. — Scaffold Law Liability Granted After Ladder Feet Modified with Tube Socks

The Fourth Department reversed Supreme Court and granted a construction worker partial summary judgment under Labor Law § 240(1) after a CSL Plasma employee duct-taped tube socks over an A-frame ladder’s feet to protect newly installed tile, causing the ladder to slide and injuring the plaintiff.

Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Uncategorized

Deming v. County of Chautauqua — Successor-Liability Claims Against Casella Waste Survive Dismissal

The Fourth Department affirmed denial of Casella Waste Management’s motion to dismiss third-party claims arising from a fatal bulldozer accident, holding that the asset purchase agreement did not conclusively negate the Schumacher “mere continuation” and “merger” exceptions to successor corporate liability.

Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Uncategorized

Castle v. Swartfiguer — Third-Party Claims Sustained Over Collapsed Basement Staircase

The Fourth Department affirmed denial of a homeowner’s motion for summary judgment dismissing third-party claims after a temporary basement staircase collapsed, holding that the homeowner’s instruction to use as few fasteners as possible raised triable questions about whether he created the dangerous condition.

Scroll to Top