Real Estate Cases
Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided): –
Clear all
Coverage since January 2, 2026
✉️ New decisions, briefed in your inbox every morning — subscribe to Daily Case Law, free →

Real Estate

Supreme Court of Alabama
Uncategorized

Mobile Investments v. Corporate Pharmacy Services — Unresolved property terms make Rule 60 order nonfinal

The Supreme Court dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. Finality depends on whether the trial court has ended the proceedings and resolved the issues before it, not merely on whether an earlier judgment was final. The order on the amended Rule 60 motion left substantive property-transfer questions pending and therefore did not put an end to the controversy.

Supreme Court of Alabama
Uncategorized

Lima One Capital v. Birmingham — Permanent demolition relief requires notice and a merits hearing

The Alabama Supreme Court reversed. Rule 65(a)(2) allows consolidation of a preliminary-injunction hearing with a merits trial, but the parties must receive clear and timely notice so they can marshal evidence and prepare to litigate final relief. A court cannot apply a provisional-relief standard and then impose an irreversible permanent remedy without that procedural protection.

Supreme Court of Alabama
Uncategorized

Ivy Fund Manager v. CDH — Unassessed damages keep default judgment and arbitration dispute interlocutory

The Alabama Supreme Court dismissed the appeal. A default judgment establishing liability but reserving damages ordinarily remains interlocutory because it does not end the litigation or fully adjudicate the parties’ rights. The continuing need to determine monetary relief was not a ministerial detail; it was part of the merits still pending before the trial court.

Supreme Court of Alabama
Uncategorized

Construction Services v. RAM-Robertsdale — “Mis-Licensure” Is Not “Non-Licensure” Under Alabama’s General Contractors Act

The Alabama Supreme Court unanimously reversed summary judgment for a subdivision developer, holding that a general contractor holding a valid Building Construction license did not void its contract by lacking a Municipal and Utility classification at signing—reaffirming the substantial-compliance exception from McNairy v. Sugar Creek Resort and refusing to equate “mis-licensure” with “non-licensure” under the Alabama General Contractor’s Practice Act.

Scroll to Top