Perkins v. 34 215 St — Notary and title closer escape deed-fraud claims
The Second Department dismissed claims against a notary and title company after an impostor conveyed another person’s property using identification that was not obviously false.
The Second Department dismissed claims against a notary and title company after an impostor conveyed another person’s property using identification that was not obviously false.
The Second Department upheld dismissal of a mortgage foreclosure after the lender waited roughly 15 years to seek more time for service and offered no excuse for the delay.
The Second Department enforced redline deletions from a construction indemnity clause, excluding purely economic losses while leaving consequential security costs for trial.
The Second Department held that a lender’s voluntary discontinuance did not reset an accelerated mortgage debt’s limitations period under the Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act.
The Second Department held that filing an order to show cause on NYSCEF did not satisfy Lien Law § 59’s personal-service requirement for vacating a mechanic’s-lien bond.
The Second Department held that a home builder plausibly alleged that the parties’ course of conduct modified written change-order requirements, preserving its lien and contract claims.
The Second Department entered judgment on a $300,000 construction loan because the signer never disclosed that he purportedly acted for the property-owning LLC.
The Second Department held reverse-mortgage owners equitably estopped from asserting limitations where repeated occupancy certifications caused the lender’s delay.
The Second Department upheld rescission of homeowner policies where the application described a one-family home but the property contained three separate dwelling units.
The Second Department held that a lender’s second foreclosure action, filed without leave, discontinued its earlier action by operation of RPAPL 1301(3), preventing later restoration.
The Second Department applied New York’s Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act to hold that a voluntary discontinuance did not reset the six-year limitations period after mortgage acceleration.
The Second Department held that a school district could not recast an architect’s alleged contractual nonperformance as negligence or fraud, and could not pursue punitive damages without an independent tort.
The Second Department vacated a commercial foreclosure judgment because a bank officer’s affidavit neither showed personal knowledge of default nor identified and attached the business records on which it relied.
The Second Department held that a school district’s use of village parkland was only an easement in gross or revocable license because the Legislature never plainly authorized an appurtenant easement.
The Second Department held that a homeowner waived a personal-jurisdiction defense by filing a general appearance and waiting years to challenge service, despite an earlier limited foreclosure-settlement appearance.
The Second Department affirmed denial of specific performance and limited a prospective Popeyes franchisee to nominal damages because possession and lost profits were not proven.
The Second Department held that lost surveillance footage justified a spoliation sanction, but reduced total liability preclusion to an adverse-inference instruction.
The Second Department held that FAPA prevented a voluntary discontinuance from resetting an accelerated mortgage debt and dismissed a 2018 foreclosure as untimely.
The Second Department allowed a subcontractor’s direct contract claims to continue but dismissed unjust-enrichment, third-party-beneficiary, and General Municipal Law theories.
The Second Department held that CPL 420.45 may render a fraudulent deed void from inception after a false-filing conviction even when no signature was forged.
The Second Department permanently stayed arbitration against a demolition subcontractor whose contract required mediation followed by litigation and contained a void unilateral arbitration option.
The Second Department upheld DHCR’s denial of a rent-stabilization exemption because the owner failed to prove serious deterioration and replacement of 75% of building systems.
The Second Department held that J-51 tenants had not proved knowing deregulation fraud on summary judgment, but rejected the landlords’ contractual attorney-fee claim.
The Second Department protected a $3.85 million buyer that reasonably relied on an LLC manager’s apparent authority despite an undisclosed later operating agreement.