Case Richard Lytle et al. v. Douglas E. Lind et al. Court Maine Supreme Judicial Court Judge MEAD (John E.
Case State of Minnesota v. Joseph William Finfrock Court Minnesota Court of Appeals Judge Schmidt (Tim Walz, 2023) Date Decided
Case City of Davenport v. Office of Auditor of State of Iowa Court Iowa Supreme Court Judge Mansfield (Terry Branstad,
First District holds that Penal Code section 396’s 10 percent emergency rent increase cap locks mobilehome rental prices at the amount authorized under the local rent control ordinance at the time of the emergency declaration, preventing landlords from stacking annual ordinance-based increases
Case In Re: Amendments to Rules Regulating the Florida Bar – Substance Use Terminology Court Supreme Court of Florida Judge
Second District reverses denial of class certification in 28-day shuffle case under Civil Code section 1940.1, holding that whether a hotel qualifies as a residential hotel turns on building-wide use patterns rather than individualized proof of each class member’s primary residence.
Fourth District holds that the COVID-19 pandemic and related government restrictions did not cause “damage” to the Brea Mall within the meaning of Revenue and Taxation Code section 170(a)(1), and that calamity reassessment requires actual physical damage to property.
Case Kennon Copeland, et al. v. Greene County Board of Supervisors, et al. Court Court of Appeals of Virginia Judge
Case Unnamed Plaintiff v. Unnamed Defendant (Real Estate Developer) — Preliminary Injunction in Title Cancellation and Registration Action Court İzmir
Case In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure Court Supreme Court of Florida Judge Muñiz (Ron DeSantis, 2019);
Case Victus 1, Inc. D/B/A Benchmark Business Brokers v. Bradshaw’s Body Shop, Inc. A/K/A Bradshaw’s Auto Body Court Louisiana Court
Fifth District holds that CC&Rs adopted by a public hospital district cannot be enforced to prohibit a clinic from providing abortion services because such enforcement would violate the California Constitution’s reproductive freedom guarantee and Civil Code section 531.
Case In re Estate of Paul A. Knapp, deceased; Barbara Knapp v. Lance Knapp, Personal Representative of the Estate of
Case Oak Hill Condominiums v. Diane Marchetti et al. Court Maine Supreme Judicial Court Judge LAWRENCE (Janet Mills, 2022) Date
Case Crystal Homestead Estates, LLC v. That Piece of Property More Fully Described as Follows: Parcel No. RPR4225004118 and Parcel
Case Board of County Supervisors of Prince William County, Virginia v. Oak Valley Homeowners Association, Inc. Court Court of Appeals
Case GW Acquisition Co., LLC v. Oak Valley Homeowners Association, Inc. (consolidated with Board of County Supervisors of Prince William
Case H&H Capital Acquisitions, LLC v. Oak Valley Homeowners Association, Inc., et al. Court Court of Appeals of Virginia Judge
Case Katy Burke, et al. v. Board of County Supervisors of Prince William County, Virginia, et al. (consolidated with three
First District holds that a plaintiff who recovers attorney fees from a tortfeasor under the tort of another doctrine cannot also recover the fees incurred in prosecuting the tort of another action itself.
Third District holds that the California Department of Water Resources may use the precondemnation entry statutes to investigate properties for a potential water conveyance project without first satisfying Water Code requirements for project authorization and funding.
Second District reverses denial of class certification in a Red Roof Inn 28-day shuffle case, holding that Civil Code section 1940.1 does not require each class member to prove individualized use of the hotel as their primary residence.
Third District affirms that building and occupying an accessory dwelling unit in Sacramento County without a building permit is a public nuisance per se enforceable through injunctive relief, regardless of whether construction is complete.
Los Angeles Appellate Division holds that noncompliance with Civil Code section 1962 is an affirmative defense for which the tenant bears the burden of proof in a residential unlawful detainer action.