Axel C.P. v. Andrews — Re-Detention Required Advance Bond Process
The district court granted the petition and ordered immediate release.
The district court granted the petition and ordered immediate release.
The district court adopted the magistrate judge’s recommendation and held the re-detention violated Fifth Amendment procedural due process.
The magistrate judge recommended immediate release on statutory grounds.
The district court independently reviewed the record, adopted the recommendation, and ordered immediate release with return of all possessions.
Crypto.com users lacked federal standing because anonymous browsing and device data did not disclose their own sensitive financial information.
A taxpayer could not use federal court to halt California tax collection because the state refund process provides an adequate remedy.
Juvenile hall abuse survivors plausibly alleged that a concealed county custom delayed accrual of their institutional civil-rights claims.
An unhoused Oakland resident was denied emergency relief because the city gave notice and offered shelter and temporary property storage.
The Southern District ordered ICE to release a previously paroled Haitian detainee arrested without notice, reasons, or a hearing.
San Diego could not relitigate pleading-stage rulings that allowed Safe Sleeping residents’ housing, disability, and danger claims to proceed.
The court granted habeas relief and ordered Dos Santos released immediately on the same conditions that applied before his detention.
The Southern District denied the petition.
The Southern District denied habeas relief.
The Southern District granted the petition and required release within three days under the prior parole terms or other appropriate recognizance conditions.
The Southern District held that Rule 41(a)(1) made the dismissal effective without a court order because the defendant had not served an answer or summary-judgment motion.
Doe v. Wells Fargo: Employer Strict Liability Requires the Harasser to Supervise the Victim.
Chin v. DoorDash: Employee Waived EFAA Protection by Withholding Known Harassment Claim.
Schmidt v. City of Pasadena: PREP Act Immunizes Workplace COVID Testing and Mask Policy.
City of Calimesa v. Everest: Four-Year Conflict-of-Interest Limit Applies to Contract Challenge.
Snow v. Align Technology: Antitrust Plaintiffs May Test Claimed Business Reasons for Refusal to Deal.
United States v. So: Foreign-Evidence Tolling Covered Bribery Conspiracy Charge.
A California federal court held that consular nonreviewability barred a couple’s challenge to an immigrant-visa denial and dismissed the case with prejudice.
A California federal court dismissed claims over an international watch-parts shipment because federal air-carriage law preempted the claims and the Carmack Amendment did not apply.
A California federal court ordered a detained child released to her mother after finding that prolonged sponsor vetting violated procedural due process.