Doe v. Wells Fargo — Employer Strict Liability Requires the Harasser to Supervise the Victim
Doe v. Wells Fargo: Employer Strict Liability Requires the Harasser to Supervise the Victim.
Doe v. Wells Fargo: Employer Strict Liability Requires the Harasser to Supervise the Victim.
Chin v. DoorDash: Employee Waived EFAA Protection by Withholding Known Harassment Claim.
Schmidt v. City of Pasadena: PREP Act Immunizes Workplace COVID Testing and Mask Policy.
City of Calimesa v. Everest: Four-Year Conflict-of-Interest Limit Applies to Contract Challenge.
Snow v. Align Technology: Antitrust Plaintiffs May Test Claimed Business Reasons for Refusal to Deal.
United States v. So: Foreign-Evidence Tolling Covered Bribery Conspiracy Charge.
A California federal court held that consular nonreviewability barred a couple’s challenge to an immigrant-visa denial and dismissed the case with prejudice.
A California federal court dismissed claims over an international watch-parts shipment because federal air-carriage law preempted the claims and the Carmack Amendment did not apply.
A California federal court ordered a detained child released to her mother after finding that prolonged sponsor vetting violated procedural due process.
A California federal court excused administrative nonexhaustion and ordered a bond hearing for a visa overstayer detained for more than a year.
A California federal court held that eleven months of mandatory immigration detention, without evidence addressing the full constitutional inquiry, did not by itself justify habeas relief.
A California federal court ordered a bond hearing because a prior assault conviction did not trigger mandatory immigration detention absent the corresponding inadmissibility charge.
The Eastern District of California addressed due-process limits on immigration detention and ordered immediate release.
The Eastern District of California addressed due-process limits on immigration detention and ordered immediate release.
The Eastern District of California addressed due-process limits on immigration detention and ordered denial of emergency release.
The Eastern District of California addressed due-process limits on immigration detention and ordered a prompt substantive bond hearing.
The Eastern District of California addressed due-process limits on immigration detention and ordered habeas relief and release unless lawful custody resumes after a final removal order.
The Eastern District of California addressed due-process limits on immigration detention and ordered a bond hearing within seven days.
The Eastern District of California addressed due-process limits on immigration detention and ordered a bond hearing or release.
The Eastern District of California addressed due-process limits on immigration detention and ordered a bond hearing within seven days or release.
The Eastern District of California addressed due-process limits on immigration detention and ordered immediate release.
The Eastern District of California addressed due-process limits on immigration detention and ordered habeas relief and immediate release.
The Eastern District ordered a prompt individualized bond hearing at which the government must justify continued immigration detention by clear and convincing evidence.
The Eastern District limited pre-certification employment discovery to the two facilities where the named plaintiff worked because she offered no evidence of statewide violations.