Deokaran v. U.S. Attorney General — court orders immediate release from immigration detention
The Eastern District ordered an immigration detainee released and required notice plus a neutral hearing before any renewed detention.
The Eastern District ordered an immigration detainee released and required notice plus a neutral hearing before any renewed detention.
The Eastern District ordered immediate release because immigration officials re-detained the petitioner without a pre-deprivation hearing.
The Eastern District granted habeas relief in part and directed a prompt bond hearing with the government bearing the burden.
A jury may decide whether promises to return a failed deal’s $335,000 transfer support California promissory-fraud and conversion claims.
The Northern District dismissed claims against Lufthansa because the Montreal Convention supplied the exclusive remedy and the complaint alleged no recoverable delay loss.
A removed-case plaintiff could join a nondiverse defendant, but only through the court’s discretionary analysis under Section 1447(e).
The Northern District preserved narrowly pleaded skincare false-advertising claims but dismissed theories involving unspecified products and statements.
A website-tracking plaintiff lacked federal standing because she did not identify sensitive information disclosed or a highly offensive privacy intrusion.
A Southern District judge ordered ICE to release a Haitian national who had lived on humanitarian parole for years before being re-detained without notice or a hearing.
A federal judge held that a liquor-liability insurer owed a defense because its own investigation revealed facts creating a potential for coverage.
A federal judge dismissed mortgage-servicing claims with prejudice because prior bankruptcy findings foreclosed the core allegations and the borrower could not plead RESPA damages.
A Southern District judge ordered the release of a former unaccompanied minor whom immigration authorities re-detained without notice or an individualized hearing.
A federal judge dismissed deficient municipal-liability claims with leave to amend while allowing a fact-dependent equitable-tolling theory to proceed beyond the pleading stage.
Rueda-Flores: Court Orders Release After ICE Re-Detention Without a Hearing.
Gonzalez Castillo: ICE Must Release Detainee Re-Arrested Without Pre-Detention Process.
Rakesh LNU: Due Process Requires Hearing Before ICE Re-Detains Released Noncitizen.
A published California decision holds that an off-duty deputy retained peace-officer authority, making a felony-murder defendant ineligible for section 1172.6 resentencing.
A school district could not classify a teacher as temporary merely because she covered hours relinquished through permanent teachers’ voluntary job sharing.
The Ninth Circuit revived part of an injury case because photographs and jail calls did not conclusively negate expert-supported internal injuries.
The Ninth Circuit held that a hospital proved undue hardship from allowing an unvaccinated mother-and-baby-unit nurse to remain in her role.
The Ninth Circuit revived two Nevada death-row habeas claims because initial post-conviction counsel’s errors may excuse their procedural default.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed dismissal of claims based on Instagram accusations arising from a climbing dispute and declined to apply Washington’s anti-SLAPP statute.
An Eastern District court held that federal jurisdiction-stripping provisions barred an APA challenge to USCIS’s dismissal of an asylum application tied to expedited removal.
A Central District court kept a wage-and-hour class action in federal court because potential waiting-time penalties alone plausibly exceeded CAFA’s $5 million threshold.