Real Estate Cases
Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided): –
Coverage since January 2, 2026
✉️ New decisions, briefed in your inbox every morning — subscribe to Daily Case Law, free →

Real Estate

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Uncategorized

Garrett v. Roanoke City Council — Planning Commission Had Authority to Continue Rezoning Hearing; No Re-Advertising Required

The Virginia Court of Appeals affirmed dismissal of a challenge to a Roanoke rezoning, holding that planning commissions have implied Dillon Rule authority to continue a rezoning hearing from one regularly scheduled meeting to the next without fresh advertising—the original notice covers the continued session, a post-hearing statutory amendment to Code § 15.2-2204 does not apply retroactively, and non-substantive amendments to the application do not independently trigger re-advertising.

Uncategorized

Mick Land Development v. Town of South Berwick — Planning Board May Condition Subdivision Approval on Redesigned Access to Protect Pedestrian Safety

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court affirmed the South Berwick Planning Board’s condition requiring a subdivision developer to route primary access through Industry Drive rather than the existing residential Meadow Pond Road, holding the Board had implied authority to impose the condition, that resident lay testimony about road hazards was competent substantial evidence, and that the decision was not arbitrary and capricious.

1st District Court of Appeal
Uncategorized

Hiller v. Marin Municipal Water District — Ratepayer’s Proposition 218 Challenge Barred by Validation Statutes After Failure to Respond to District’s Validation Action

First District holds that a ratepayer’s Proposition 218 challenge to water rates is permanently barred after she failed to participate in the water district’s validation action within the 120-day window set by Government Code section 53759.

Ohio Court of Appeals (Eighth District)
Uncategorized

Pascoe v. Detke — Eighth District affirms summary judgment for seller and realtor in century-home sale dispute under caveat emptor

The Eighth District affirmed summary judgment for the seller and real estate agent in a residential sale dispute, holding that Ohio’s caveat emptor doctrine barred fraud claims where the buyer purchased a 108-year-old home as-is with an inspection contingency.

Scroll to Top