Show: 1 day 1 week 1 month All
Custom (decided): –
Coverage since June 4, 2026
✉️ New decisions, briefed in your inbox every morning — subscribe to Daily Case Law, free →

Utah

Court of Appeals of Utah
Uncategorized

Paulson v. Paulson — Expert Exclusion Was Harmless and Premarital Agreement Could Not Bar Statutory Attorney Fees in High-Asset Divorce

The Utah Court of Appeals reversed an expert exclusion and attorney fees denial in a high-asset divorce arising from a California-law premarital agreement, holding that a technically deficient expert disclosure was harmless where the disclosing party promptly provided a full report and offered deposition access, and that a premarital agreement’s separate-property clause cannot waive a spouse’s right to attorney fees under Utah Code § 81-1-203(1).

Court of Appeals of Utah
Uncategorized

Hammon v. Zoom Inc. — Economic Loss Rule Bars Fraud Claims Against Corporate Officers Who Negotiated the Contract, Utah Court of Appeals Holds

The Utah Court of Appeals held for the first time that the economic loss rule bars fraud claims against corporate officers and agents who negotiated a contract on the company’s behalf, when those claims completely overlap with the corporation’s contractual duties — and reversed summary judgment on breach of contract and declaratory judgment claims because the district court had never determined what the contracts actually required.

Court of Appeals of Utah
Uncategorized

American Fork City v. Barbour — Nail-Biting During Baker Observation Period Required Clock Reset, Making Trial Counsel Ineffective for Not Moving to Suppress Breath Test

The Utah Court of Appeals vacated a DUI conviction and remanded for a new trial, holding that trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to move to suppress a breath test after bodycam footage showed the defendant biting his fingernails continuously for over two minutes during the Baker pre-test observation period — a question of first impression establishing that fingernail contact constitutes introduction of a foreign object requiring the Baker clock to restart.

Court of Appeals of Utah
Uncategorized

Christensen v. Christensen — District Court Must Hold Hearing and Apply Independent Review to Commissioner’s Child Support Recommendation

The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed a post-decree minivan enforcement order because ordering payment of lost equity fell within the four corners of the divorce decree, but reversed a child support arrearage ruling because the district court refused to hold an evidentiary hearing mandated by Utah R. Civ. P. 108(d)(2) and applied abuse-of-discretion review instead of the independent assessment required by rule 108(f).

Scroll to Top