The Third District reversed both transfers. Although juvenile-court jurisdiction can continue after age 18, the Legislature used “minor” deliberately in section 750. Once C.M. became an adult, his residence could not automatically be derived from his parents’ residence. The transfer courts therefore
The South Carolina Court of Appeals upheld apportionment of six mortgage and credit-card income streams to South Carolina and sustained understatement penalties, while modifying the governing subsection for card income.
The South Carolina Court of Appeals held that Mastercard performs income-producing activity in the state when its network enables transactions at South Carolina merchants and upheld assessments and failure-to-file penalties.
The published panel affirmed. Medicaid participation and audit rules did not make the asserted notice defects jurisdictional, and the Department’s notices identified data analysis as the ground for prepayment review while explaining the compliance standards applied. Federal rules did not require disclosure of audit details that could compromise program-integrity work.
A divided Commonwealth Court dismissed as moot an operator’s challenge to Environmental Hearing Board conditions because the unconventional gas-well permits expired during the appeal.
The Commonwealth Court held that a school district’s new access drive did not constitute land development and that substantial evidence supported the zoning board’s traffic-safety finding.
The Utah Court of Appeals upheld dismissal of a procurement protest because the initial protest apologized and supplied facts but did not identify a legal ground for reversal.
The Second District held that POBRA did not govern an officer’s termination for failing to meet a generally applicable vaccination qualification.
The Commonwealth Court dismissed parole-violation charges with prejudice because the Board failed to prove a timely revocation hearing and could not cure its evidentiary failure after the hearing.
The Fifth District held that sexually violent predator patients are governed by regulations permitting contraband inspection, not the LPS Act’s right to unopened correspondence.
A published California appellate decision revived residents’ claims that Stanton failed to meet affordable-housing replacement and relocation-planning duties during a long-running neighborhood acquisition project.
The court affirmed the Commissioner. Normal respiratory and pulmonary examinations supplied substantial evidence for the ALJ’s functional assessment, and Nunn did not identify a concrete additional restriction that the record required.
Bombardini v. Board of Psychology: Challenge to Discipline Was Untimely and Probation Ruling Stands.
Steer v. Town of Los Gatos: Discretionary Street Dedication Defeats CEQA Ministerial Exemption.
A California federal court ordered immediate release after ICE re-detained a supervised noncitizen without complying with statutory and regulatory revocation safeguards.
A California federal court vacated a Social Security denial because the administrative law judge selectively read the medical record when rejecting the claimant’s pain testimony.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that a public-benefits claimant need not prove a substantial burden to establish a First Amendment Free Exercise claim and remanded for application of the correct forced-choice standard.
A California federal court held that consular nonreviewability barred a couple’s challenge to an immigrant-visa denial and dismissed the case with prejudice.
A California federal court excused administrative nonexhaustion and ordered a bond hearing for a visa overstayer detained for more than a year.
A school district could not classify a teacher as temporary merely because she covered hours relinquished through permanent teachers’ voluntary job sharing.
An Eastern District court held that federal jurisdiction-stripping provisions barred an APA challenge to USCIS’s dismissal of an asylum application tied to expedited removal.
An Eastern District court gave the Labor Department until December 30, 2026 to replace its invalid H-2A wage rule and scheduled vacatur for the same date.
A Northern District court held that allegations of an imminent landslide danger defeated a property owner’s claim to notice before Santa Clara County’s emergency abatement work.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court upheld DHS’s nursing-facility inflation methodology while clarifying how state courts evaluate an agency’s reading of its own ambiguous regulation.