Central District of California denies remand of a misappropriation-of-likeness suit, holding that a plaintiff’s rejection of a $75,001 settlement offer is an “other paper” that started the 30-day removal clock and itself proved the amount in controversy.
First District affirms convictions for possessing an assault weapon and a large-capacity magazine, holding the inventory search of the defendant’s vehicle was lawful and that California’s assault-weapon and magazine bans survive Bruen.
First District denies habeas relief, holding that CDCR may constitutionally permit only educational merit credits — and not other prison conduct credits — to advance an inmate’s youth-parole eligibility date under Penal Code section 3051.
Second District holds an inmate identified by CDCR as eligible for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.75 does not lose that eligibility by being released on parole before the resentencing hearing occurs.
Second District affirms an order compelling arbitration of an employee’s individual wage claims and dismissing her class claims, holding the parties’ arbitration agreement is governed by the Federal Arbitration Act because they expressly said so.
The court denied an emergency motion to bar Immigration and Customs Enforcement from arresting an applicant at her green-card interview at the San Diego USCIS office, finding that even though similar arrests had been documented at the same office, the plaintiff had not shown that arrest was likely i
Eastern District of California affirms a disability denial where the administrative law judge erred by stating that the claimant never reported her need to lie down — the records did show such reports — but the error was harmless because the ALJ provided independent, valid reasons to discount the te
Eastern District of California denies the plaintiff’s motion to remand a wage-and-hour class action against Land O’Lakes and Kozy Shack Enterprises, holding the defendants’ updated expert calculations satisfy the $5 million amount-in-controversy threshold under the Class Action Fai
In a breach-of-contract dispute over a $160,000 fee demand following a cybersecurity vendor’s alleged failure to detect a 2023 data breach at a Georgia orthopedic clinic, the court dismissed the vendor’s counterclaim theories for fraud in the inducement, breach of the implied covenant of
Judge Gilliam remands a putative class action against Delta Dental of California to San Francisco Superior Court for lack of Article III standing, after Delta Dental removed the case based on the federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act and immediately moved to dismiss for lack of standing — a