California Case Summaries
Clear all
Coverage since January 1, 2026

California

Uncategorized

Velazquez-Ortega v. General Motors LLC — C.D. Cal. Denies Lemon-Law Remand Where GM Documented Damages and Plaintiff Specifically Alleged Willfulness

Judge Sunshine Sykes denied remand of a Chevrolet Silverado lemon-law case where GM documented $67,065.58 in actual damages and plaintiff specifically alleged willfulness based on eight unsuccessful repair attempts, allowing civil penalties to push the amount in controversy to about $128,833 — well

Uncategorized

Angulo Santillano v. Wayfair LLC — C.D. Cal. Denies Remand of Wrongful-Termination Suit, Counting Punitive and Emotional-Distress Damages at 1:1 Ratios

Judge Sunshine Sykes denied remand of a Wayfair wrongful-termination suit, counting $32,302 in past lost wages plus 1:1 ratios for emotional-distress and punitive damages to reach roughly $96,908 — well above the $75,000 diversity threshold. Plaintiff’s mitigation argument was rejected because

Uncategorized

Vidal v. Walgreen Co. — C.D. Cal. Sua Sponte Remands Wrongful-Termination Suit, Refusing to Include Speculative Damages and Calling for Higher Diversity Threshold

Judge David O. Carter sua sponte remanded a Walgreens wrongful-termination case after refusing to credit speculative emotional-distress, punitive, and attorneys’ fees damages — leaving only $24,327 in past lost wages, well below the $75,000 threshold. He used the opinion to call on Congress to

Uncategorized

Vacational Bike Rentals LLC v. Kitzuma Corp. — C.D. Cal. Allows Negligence and Unjust Enrichment Claims Against Cycling Logistics Defendants Where Carmack Preemption Is Unclear

Judge Christina Snyder allowed negligence and unjust enrichment claims to proceed in a $75,000 stolen-bicycle case against Kitzuma and BikeExchange, holding that Carmack Amendment preemption could not be resolved at the motion-to-dismiss stage because the operative pleading did not clearly character

Uncategorized

Estrada Pelagio v. Modern Floor Specialists — C.D. Cal. Remands Janitor’s FEHA Suit, Rejects Removal Premised on IRCA/Hoffman Defense

Judge Hernán D. Vera remanded a janitor’s FEHA discrimination and wage-and-hour suit to state court, rejecting the employer’s argument that the plaintiff’s possible undocumented status and the IRCA/Hoffman back-pay defense created federal-question jurisdiction under Grable. The cou

Uncategorized

Mora Sandoval v. General Motors LLC — C.D. Cal. Denies Remand of GMC Yukon Lemon-Law Suit Where Documented Damages and Repair History Support Civil Penalties

Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo denied remand of a 2021 GMC Yukon lemon-law case, holding GM had no duty to investigate beyond the complaint and the documented $78,776 in actual damages plus civil penalties (twice actual damages, supported by at least five repair attempts) brought the amount in c

Uncategorized

Lopez Lopez v. General Motors LLC — C.D. Cal. Denies Remand of Chevy Silverado Lemon-Law Suit Over $54K in Documented Damages Plus Civil Penalties

Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo denied remand of a 2019 Chevy Silverado lemon-law case, holding documented actual damages of $54,232 plus civil penalties (twice actual damages, supported by at least ten repair attempts) brought the amount in controversy to roughly $162,698 — well over the $75,000

Uncategorized

Ascencio v. General Motors LLC — C.D. Cal. Denies Remand of Chevy Silverado Lemon-Law Suit Where Mileage Offset Eats Most of Purchase Price But Civil Penalties Push Past $75K

Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo denied remand of a 2022 Chevy Silverado lemon-law suit where actual damages were modest ($34,932) after the mileage offset, but specific willfulness allegations and six repair attempts justified including civil penalties (twice actual damages), bringing the amount

Scroll to Top