Pratt v. Anonymous Physician 1 — Court revives part of malpractice claim
The Court of Appeals applied Indiana’s constitutional discovery exception to revive claims against a pulmonologist but held claims against a family doctor untimely.
The Court of Appeals applied Indiana’s constitutional discovery exception to revive claims against a pulmonologist but held claims against a family doctor untimely.
The Court of Appeals vacated a default judgment and held Indiana lacked personal jurisdiction over three Pennsylvania defendants whose alleged conduct was not purposefully directed to Indiana.
The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed a custody modification to Mother, holding that a GAL report filed electronically ten calendar days before a hearing was timely — the ten-day deadline runs on calendar days, not business days — and that Indiana’s new Trial Rule 7(D) requires continuance motions to include timing estimates or risk procedural denial.