Bent v. Cirone — Condo board members face direct retaliation claims
The First Department reinstated direct claims against condominium board members accused of personally directing an animus-driven retaliation campaign.
The First Department reinstated direct claims against condominium board members accused of personally directing an animus-driven retaliation campaign.
The First Department held that possible negligence by a property owner’s managing agents prevented summary judgment on contractual indemnification under General Obligations Law § 5-322.1.
A divided First Department held that conflicting accounts of a trench accident and evidence of available bracing precluded summary judgment under Labor Law § 240(1).
The First Department upheld treatment of HAMP-deferred mortgage principal as subsequent recoveries that write up subordinate, but not senior, RMBS certificates.
The First Department held that Lien Law § 19(6) permits summary discharge only for defects visible on the lien’s face, not fact disputes over owner consent.
The First Department held that a criminal seizure proceeding could not conclusively transfer a disputed Egon Schiele painting without a civil title action and jury-trial protections.
The First Department held that drilling two holes to run Wi-Fi cable did not significantly change a building and therefore fell outside Labor Law § 240(1).
The First Department allowed New York assault and gender-violence claims to proceed under the Adult Survivors Act but dismissed Nevada-based emotional-distress allegations as untimely.
The First Department reduced a record-setting bus-injury verdict but sustained $37 million in pain-and-suffering damages for a plaintiff with catastrophic, permanent injuries.
The First Department held that a defective permanent staircase was a Labor Law § 240(1) safety device where no viable alternative route reached the work area.
The First Department affirmed a $100-per-day contempt award after OMH left an incompetent defendant at Rikers for months beyond a court-ordered transfer deadline.
The First Department found competing expert proof on vehicle electronics and crashworthiness sufficient to preserve design-defect, warning, warranty, and related claims.
The First Department held that a $3.6 million liquidated-damages cap applied to delay damages, not all direct damages in a Times Square construction pass-through claim.
The First Department vacated a $301.25 million Manhattan land valuation because the neutral umpire’s outside-employment discussions and later procedural rulings created prejudicial partiality.
The First Department enforced a sophisticated-party nonrecourse clause to dismiss tortious-interference claims arising from a disputed energy-company equity transaction.
The First Department reinstated a hedge-fund jury verdict, holding that overlapping facts and a theoretical risk of inconsistent findings did not justify retrying five rejected counterclaims.
The First Department exercised interest-of-justice discretion to send a 17-year-old’s weapon case to Family Court because prosecutors had not shown extraordinary circumstances overcoming Raise the Age’s removal presumption.
The First Department held that gradual acid-rock drainage fell within pollution exclusions and that Canadian law would not materially change the coverage result.
The First Department enforced an RMBS no-action clause because HBK’s zero-principal-balance certificates carried no voting rights when it demanded litigation.
The First Department held that inaccurately transcribing a seizure date onto a DMV physician form is ordinary negligence governed by a three-year limitations period.
The First Department held that a title agent’s guarantor lacked a common-law indemnity claim against a recording vendor that owed him no separate duty.
The First Department dismissed a school aide’s injury claim because a recess contractor owed no third-party duty and an errant basketball was an assumed risk.
The First Department vacated an antisuit injunction because a Delaware action over a later agreement did not threaten fraud or a gross wrong against the foreign court.
The First Department held that a scaffold can violate Labor Law § 240(1) by tipping during operation even without a physical defect, and rejected sole-proximate-cause and recalcitrant-worker defenses.